Dod contract management software

Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide. Oracle Data Miner. Parametric Estimating - Linear Regression. Parametric Estimating - Multiple Regression. Parametric Estimating Handbook. Partnet eCommerce Suite. Performance and Pricing Models. Performance Based Payments Analysis Tool. Practical Advice for Earned Value Management. Practical Advice for Integrated Baseline Reviews. Practical Advice for Integrated Master Plans. Practical Advice for Integrated Master Schedules. Practical Advice for Stakeholder Engagement.

Practical Advice for Work Breakdown Structures. Prices Paid Tool. Primavera Risk Analysis. Procedures Review Guide. Process Capability "Cp" and "Cpk" Calculator. Pro-Concepts Risk Radar Enterprise.

Product and Service Code Selection Tool. Product Support Analytical Tools Database. Product Support Business Model. Product Support Strategy Development Tool. Program Manager PM Toolkit.

Program Manager's Guidebook for Software Assurance. Property Loss Checklist. PTC Arbortext. Quanterion Solutions Plus. Readiness Based Leveling. Reclama Reference Card. Requiring Cost or Pricing Data Flowchart. Sample Property Letter. SBA Goaling and Scorecard website. Service Acquisition Mall. Service Requirements Matrix.

Siemens Teamcenter. Significant Determination Resolution Process. Significant Determination Resolution Process Flowchart. SiliconExpert's Part Search. Simple Linear Regression Tool. Small Business Decision Chart and Narrative. Small Business Program Decision Chart. Space Acquisition Process Chart. Space Acquisition Rapid Deployment Training. Steps to Performance Based Acquisition. Subcontracting Plan Assessment Checklist.

Symmetric Approximation. Talent Management Reference Guide. Technical Leadership Guidebook. Technical Leadership Workbook. DOD continues to track workforce metrics on a quarterly basis, including the overall size of the workforce, the number of personnel by career field, attrition rates, the level of education attained, and the percent that met training requirements, among others.

Demonstrated progress: met. Since , DOD has significantly rebuilt the acquisition workforce as measured by the number of personnel in acquisition career fields, their experience level, education level, and training certification. Metrics tracked by DOD provide evidence that DOD is more than sustaining the size of the acquisition workforce and continues to demonstrate commitment to improving the quality of the acquisition workforce.

However, it does not mean that DOD has eliminated all risk associated with its acquisition workforce. Ratings for this segment have changed since our High-Risk Report. DOD has partially met the previously unmet action plan criterion. In addition, DOD continues to partially meet the capacity, monitoring, and demonstrated progress criteria. DOD continues to meet the criterion for leadership commitment. DOD has demonstrated sustained leadership commitment by revising its service acquisitions instruction in January The revised instruction updated the Service Requirements Review Board SRRB process for reviewing, validating, approving, and verifying requirements for service acquisitions at both the DOD and the component level.

Capacity: partially met. In August , we recommended DOD reassess leadership positions intended to strategically manage service acquisitions by portfolio because we found that the individuals in those positions had limited capacity. In , DOD plans to issue additional guidance on how the department can use category management to better manage service acquisitions.

However, DOD has not yet demonstrated that individuals in key leadership positions have the capacity necessary to effectively implement this guidance. Action plan: partially met. The January service acquisitions instruction identified a number of actions that DOD intends to take to further enhance its ability to manage service acquisitions. For example, the instruction updated the process through which the SRRBs can support budget planning. In , we reported that the SRRBs had limited ability to inform budgeting decisions or support trade-off decisions within and across portfolios of service acquisitions.

In , we recommended DOD include its projected spending on service acquisitions in its future-years defense plan. DOD officials have reported that the department may issue additional guidance in October identifying how components should collect and report information on service acquisitions beyond the budget year.

Monitoring: partially met. Since our assessment, DOD has taken steps to collect data and develop metrics to monitor service acquisitions, but additional action is needed. Additionally, DOD officials told us the department has used the inventory of contracted services to identify capability gaps. This use of the inventory of contracted services constitutes progress since , when we reported that DOD was not using the inventory to help inform workforce and budget decisions, as statutorily required.

However, DOD has not yet established how it will monitor implementation of the SRRB process outlined in the new service acquisitions instruction. Demonstrated progress: partially met.

However, DOD will not be able to fully demonstrate progress in how it manages service acquisitions through the Future Years Defense Program until the department issues guidance for collecting and reporting on how service acquisitions will be used beyond the budget year.

DOD continues to demonstrate sustained commitment and strong leadership support in addressing OCS issues. DOD has also issued and updated a directive delineating roles and responsibilities for OCS planning and execution throughout the department. However, efforts are under way to address these OCS capability shortfalls.

For example, DOD has completed four out of 15 actions identified in the August Joint Requirements Oversight Council memorandum aimed at improving policy, education, personnel, and force structure analysis, and officials stated in December that the department expects to close four additional actions by April According to DOD officials, the model will be used to inform education and training, hiring practices, and other manpower decisions.

DOD completed and validated this model in November and expects to finalize it through publication in Going forward, it will also be important for DOD to demonstrate that capacity will not diminish at the combatant commands as a result of the dissolution of the Joint Contingency Acquisitions Support Office in Planners from that organization have for several years been embedded in the commands to help develop OCS annexes to operational plans, and it will be important for DOD to ensure this OCS capability is not lost.

In October , DOD issued its seventh OCS Action Plan, which is organized around five core areas to address capability shortfalls in training and education, lessons learned, policy changes and emerging requirements.

The groups meet regularly and are cochaired by senior officials in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff. DOD continues to make progress in addressing recommendations we have previously identified as high priority. For example, in response to our December recommendation, DOD has developed a draft directive to provide comprehensive, department-wide guidance on vendor threat mitigation. At the same time, it has extended its interim directive-type memorandum to use until the directive is issued.

However, after several years, DOD has still not issued its revised keystone instruction detailing how OCS should be integrated into plans and training, among other things. Senior DOD officials expect to issue the instruction by the end of March DOD officials estimated that this guidance will be issued by June DOD obligates hundreds of billions of dollars annually on contracts for goods and services.

DOD reduced the size of its acquisition workforce in the mids as defense budgets decreased. Amid concerns about skill gaps and a growing reliance on contractors, DOD has been rebuilding its workforce since DOD has spent billions of dollars on contractors to support military activities it conducts around the world.

By more effectively monitoring profitability you can better identify which project management processes you need to improve.

Additionally, if you streamline your accounting processes you can save time and avoid costly errors which arise frequently when data is not integrated or needs to be manually re-entered in multiple systems. QuickBooks by Intuit offers incredibly popular accounting software products to businesses of all industries.

The answer depends on usage and additional software integrations. For instance, when time tracking features are used correctly and honestly by all team members, QuickBooks can be DCAA compliant by creating an audit trail for timesheets.

Talk with a Software Expert…. Get a free consultation from an independent system expert. Get Recommendations. Popular Products No products found. Price Range. Experience significant cost savings as you better control operating costs, increase labor efficiency, support DCAA audits, monitor company cash flow, and effectively manage individual…. DCAA-Assist is here to help you navigate and master the complexity of government contracts requirements so you may develop and implement accounting solutions that are fully compliant with these unique accounting and reporting regulations.

Client OS. Get high ROI and continuous value from your cloud accounting software provider, not just a maintenance bill. With ContractEdge powered by Intacct, you receive automatic quarterly upgrades that are touch-free for you—no business disruption, no costly…. As a federal contractor, Daston Corporation understands the unique cost accounting requirements for businesses that sell to the U. PROCAS was designed to align the way accounting software functions with the way people are required to operate within the confines of government contracting regulations.

Accounting, timekeeping, expense reporting, and project management systems are all…. S2 Project Accounting. Government contractors know all about the Defense Contract Audit Agency. So do we! In fact, S2 Incorporated originally designed the S2 Project Accounting module after extensively working with government contracting agencies and providing consulting for….

Whether you are a seasoned government contractor looking to streamline your….